Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
Date: 2005-06-08 00:51:16
Message-ID: 20050607214758.K34152@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Marc,
>
>> Personally, we shoudl accept the .Org booth regardless of whether the
>> Commercial one is setup ... if we *don't*, the offer may not be made
>> next year, since we obviously didn't need it ...
>
> Or we'll piss off O'Reilly by askign for a booth we don't need. Remember
> that the .ORG booths are at *their* cost.

Just a thought ... SRA/CP are willing to put together a booth that, as far
as I've read, is meant for the .ORG ... why not accept the .Org booth
itself, and use the money saved from the booth cost for other expenses? I
don't know how much the booth space itself costs, so not sure how much of
a different it would make, but, for instance, maybe the 'cost of the booth
itself' could be used (assuming it is allowed) to get a "big blue elephant
ballon" made that either floats (or hangs) over the booth so that you see
if from a distance, even if you aren't right beside the booth ... or
something like that?

Instead of two booths, have one, but make it much more visible ... ?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-06-08 01:04:14 Re: Request for support for GIST enhancements
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-06-08 00:09:02 Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?