Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
Date: 2005-06-07 17:49:03
Message-ID: 20050607144745.G34152@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Robert Bernier wrote:

> On June 7, 2005 01:01 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I am not sure it is going to be that much larger than previously. In
>> fact, it hasn't increased in size in a few years, and is smaller in some
>> respects like the number of talks.
>>
>> Even at Linuxworld I think we are better with one booth.
>
> There's going to be a total of 60 booths, commercial and opensource, at
> OSCON 2005.
>
> There's a lot to be said having two booths at the same convention but on
> thinking back at Linux world this past February I realised that having
> more than one kind of group working the booth was one of the factors
> that made it work, For that matter, last year's OSCON had guys from all
> over the place which I think really added to it's success too.

One thing that works against this, though, is crowding ... by having two
booths, one would hope that things wouldn't *look* crowded ... I tend to
avoid the crowded booths at a show, and come back later when there are
hopefully less ppl, so that I can talk to someone, instead of listening to
someone else talk ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-06-07 17:49:35 Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-06-07 17:48:39 Re: [IMPORTANT] OSCON 1 or 2 booths?