Re: return_next for plperl (was Re: call for help)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: ams(at)oryx(dot)com, plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: return_next for plperl (was Re: call for help)
Date: 2005-06-04 22:55:30
Message-ID: 200506042255.j54MtUi15377@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> This has broken the regression tests for plperl - see for example
>
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=panda&dt=2005-06-04%2021:20:01
> That's because, as Abhijit noted in point 4 below, select foo_srf() no
> longer works.
>
> At a minimum those calls need to be removed from the regression tests.
>
> See also my later comments in response to Neil's request of a few days ago.
> In particular, I would very much like the callback function renamed to a
> simple "return_next".

OK, would you please submit a patch to fix it. Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-04 22:56:15 Re: AllocSetReset improvement
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-04 22:52:31 Re: ARRAY() returning NULL instead of ARRAY[] resp. {}