From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | ams(at)oryx(dot)com, plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: return_next for plperl (was Re: call for help) |
Date: | 2005-06-04 22:55:30 |
Message-ID: | 200506042255.j54MtUi15377@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> This has broken the regression tests for plperl - see for example
>
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=panda&dt=2005-06-04%2021:20:01
> That's because, as Abhijit noted in point 4 below, select foo_srf() no
> longer works.
>
> At a minimum those calls need to be removed from the regression tests.
>
> See also my later comments in response to Neil's request of a few days ago.
> In particular, I would very much like the callback function renamed to a
> simple "return_next".
OK, would you please submit a patch to fix it. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-04 22:56:15 | Re: AllocSetReset improvement |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-04 22:52:31 | Re: ARRAY() returning NULL instead of ARRAY[] resp. {} |