Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psql backslash consistency

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql backslash consistency
Date: 2005-05-28 00:31:51
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:16:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> writes:
> > How about a psql config option?  It should default to show only
> > non-system objects, as that is the most generally useful behavior.
> There seems to be a distinct lack of unanimity about that judgment ;-)

Well, yes, _across Postgres hackers_.  But if we were to ask
pgsql-general I have a feeling we would measure more weight on one side.

Now, with your suggestion of having a config entry which would allow to
set the default independently for each kind of object, maybe we should
consider setting different defaults for each: for example, user-only for
tables and functions, but user-and-system for operators.

Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]>)
"Si quieres ser creativo, aprende el arte de perder el tiempo"

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-05-28 00:33:30
Subject: Re: psql backslash consistency
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-05-27 23:40:17
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix PID file location?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group