Re: psql backslash consistency

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql backslash consistency
Date: 2005-05-28 00:33:30
Message-ID: 1906.1117240410@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> On Friday 27 May 2005 15:09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I didn't find any. Nevertheless, while there are undoubtedly some uses
>> for everything, making this the default behavior does not seem
>> acceptable.

> ISTM it is more acceptable than you're willing to admit.

> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/msg00009.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/msg00102.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00199.php

As near as I can tell, opinion is divided about fifty-fifty among those
who have bothered to weigh in ... which is hardly a strong case for
making an enforced change in long-standing behavior (since those who
want a change have more of an incentive to say so than those who don't).

A customization variable is definitely sounding like the way to go
if we're going to do anything here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-05-28 00:34:07 Re: [HACKERS] Fix PID file location?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-05-28 00:31:51 Re: psql backslash consistency