| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Steckel <mjs(at)eworldes(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres in government |
| Date: | 2005-05-19 20:16:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20050519201656.GA13225@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:19:16AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Josh,
>
> > Sandia Labs
> > US Army
> > Dept of Forestry
> > State of California
> > NCSA
> > NOAA
>
> Wow, amazingly enough, the above doesn't include any of the three.
> Is there a Federal agency *not* using PostgreSQL?
I doubt it.
As I see it, PostgreSQL is in approximately the position that Linux,
Apache, Perl, &c. were in the late 1990s, which is to say that it's
already been sneaked, er, I mean "informally deployed" into just about
every IT organization worth the name, and is just starting to get some
official recognition.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-05-19 20:17:48 | Re: Postgres in government |
| Previous Message | Mark Harrison | 2005-05-19 20:10:45 | Re: Postgres in government |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-05-19 20:17:48 | Re: Postgres in government |
| Previous Message | Mark Harrison | 2005-05-19 20:10:45 | Re: Postgres in government |