Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Date: 2005-05-17 18:31:45
Message-ID: 200505171131.45161.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew,

> Last time it came up I thought the problem was that there was not a
> consensus on *which* bugtracker to use.

Or whether to use one. Roughly 1/3 bugzilla, 1/3 something else, and 1/3
don't want a bugtracker. And, among the people who didn't want bugzilla,
some were vehemently opposed to it. Bugtrackers discussed included GForge,
bugzilla, RT, Roundup, Jura (they offered a free license) and a few I don't
remember.

> Incidentally, I'm not advocating we use bugzilla (if anything I think
> I'd lean towards using RT), but this seems like a good opportunity to
> note that as of a week or two ago bugzilla's HEAD branch supports using
> PostgreSQL as its backing store, and this will be maintained.

One of the things which came out of the bugtracker discussion is that anything
we use must have the ability for developers to interact 100% by e-mail, as
some critical developers will not use a web interface.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-05-17 18:34:46 Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-17 18:27:13 Re: alternate regression dbs?