Re: Two points about docs

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vladimir Chukharev <chu(at)h33(dot)erkki(dot)ton(dot)tut(dot)fi>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two points about docs
Date: 2005-05-10 01:50:16
Message-ID: 200505100150.j4A1oGa03929@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Vladimir Chukharev wrote:
> On Sun, 08 May 2005 06:18:04 +0300, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > I have added your first two suggestions. Not sure where to put the
> > large object links in the function section. It seems out of place there
> > to me.
>
> Thanks!
>
> About the link to the lo_* functions. I thought about adding
> a sentence to Charpter 9 like 'And functions to manipulate large
> objects are presented in Charpter 28.' right after the phrase
> 'Users can also define their own functions and operators, as
> described in Part V.'
>
> Do you think it's suitable?

Not really. We don't mention pg_stat_activity functions either. I
think people have to realize that some functions are covered in other
sections of the manual. There is a clearly titled section for large
objeccts.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-11 02:15:29 Re: Translate Postgresql FAQ into Chinese
Previous Message Geoffrey 2005-05-09 20:00:59 Re: Whence the Opterons?