| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Undisclosed(dot)Recipients: ; |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Views, views, views! (long) |
| Date: | 2005-05-10 04:59:51 |
| Message-ID: | 200505092159.52536.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert,
> As Jim points out, their current long term goal is to be a replacement for
> the current system views (hence *new* system views), and the current
> project was created to facilitate development. What I am thinking is that
> the project take on a different goal, mainly that it be an add on that
> intends to work along side the current system views and be both backward
> and forward compatible (hence *enhanced* system views). It's a subtle
> difference.
*what* current system views? We appear to have 8 of them. 2 we're not
touching at this time. The other 6 are all deficient in various ways, and
those ways are not fixable in a backwards-compatible fashion.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-05-10 06:00:49 | Re: Table Partitioning, Part 1 |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-10 03:34:22 | Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres |