| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Date: | 2005-05-05 17:45:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200505051045.25291.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
> I have no problem with pushing out any part of contrib that doesn't seem
> tightly tied to the core server. I'm not entirely sure where to draw
> the line, but for instance I'd probably want to keep dblink where it is,
> since functions-returning-records are still in considerable flux.
Yes, I wanted to discuss this on a module-by-module basis before feature
freeze. Will post my notes on it in a couple weeks.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-05 17:58:53 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-05 17:27:59 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-05 17:48:55 | Re: Views, views, views! (long) |
| Previous Message | Rosser Schwarz | 2005-05-05 17:37:42 | Re: A real puzzler: ANY way to recover? |