| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Date: | 2005-05-05 17:19:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200505051019.08725.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
> Uh, that's not exactly what is being proposed. It would be a separate
> tarball that you could untar wherever you felt like, because it would
> not depend on the core source tree at all --- only on the files
> installed by a previous build of the core.
Still sounds good. Do you think that this system could be extended to other
add-ons in the future which are currently more complex builds? And allow us
to out some of the wierder things in /contrib?
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-05 17:27:59 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-05 17:05:55 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-05 17:27:59 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-05 17:17:44 | Re: Views, views, views! (long) |