Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-05 16:17:55
Message-ID: 200505050917.55201.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> But packaging them as separately buildable tarballs that depend only
> on the installed core fileset (headers + pgxs) seems a fine idea.

I really can't see doing this without a better (i.e. CPAN / emerge / ports -
like ) build system. Mind you, I'd really like such a build system, but if
we require users to manually download several separate tarballs and untar
them in exactly the right spot in the source tree, we're adding a bunch of
extra effort for both users and packagers.

Improving the download/build/install process needs to be part of "pushing out"
any core stuff. Of course, if we can make improvements, that could also
lead to having an "all drivers" tarball that would build easily, and
packaging other add-ons for easy build, which would be cool.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 16:20:25 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-05 16:16:52 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 16:20:25 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-05 16:16:52 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement