Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-04 14:55:18
Message-ID: 20050504115456.D53065@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 4 May 2005, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

>> Yup, and *everyone* with commit accesss has access to *everything* ... I
>> could intruduce a 1 bit change to one of the kernel sources and there is a
>> chance that nobody would ever notice it ... and this includes (or, at
>> least, the last time I did any work) port committers ...
>
> Using cvsacls could deal with that particular problem. Take the PHP
> project's 1500 committers, and how they can only modify particular files.

cvsacls? got a URL for that that I can read?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2005-05-04 14:58:51 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-04 14:53:51 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement