| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-04-29 16:10:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20050429161011.GA8734@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 12:43:37 -0300,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> Except for the surprise of peridically having the system go unresponsive
> because it hit a large table, and that new user wondering what is wrong
> with postgresql that it just stalls seemingly randomly :(
I think most users running systems with that large of tables will know
what they are doing. And will be more careful with vacuum.
Vacuum running for a long time on large tables with few pages that need
updating is really a separate problem that could use its own solution.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-04-29 16:34:56 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-29 15:59:45 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-04-29 16:34:56 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-29 15:59:45 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |