| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql |
| Date: | 2005-04-25 17:19:21 |
| Message-ID: | 200504251719.j3PHJLu18416@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > The current way is ok for me at the moment. I still think there is a better
> > way (parsing statements like it's already done for
> > no-transaction-allowed-statements), but hey, as soon as your patch will be
> > applied, I can myself propose another patch to improve this. ;-)
>
> Parsing the statment will not help: even if the statement is a savepoint, we
> need to wrap it in case we need to roll it back. The only other option I
> can see to my patch is to, upon a successful user savepoint creation,
> roll back their savepoint and immediately reissue it. That seems worse to
> me than having N*2 savepoints though.
Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-25 17:28:46 | Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-25 17:17:49 | Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-25 17:28:46 | Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-25 17:17:49 | Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql |