| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at |
| Subject: | Re: Constant WAL replay |
| Date: | 2005-04-24 17:20:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20050424172039.GD24170@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:10:34AM +0200, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> The idea: We are looking for a way to implement a synchronous
> single-master / multiple slaves systems.
> Meanwhile we are able to serialize / deserialize WAL records and send
> them to a group communication system which transports those records to
> the slave database.
> This is not hard to do.
In fact, I believe Command Prompt's Mammoth Replicator does exactly
this.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"La victoria es para quien se atreve a estar solo"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-04-24 17:58:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? |
| Previous Message | Marko Ristola | 2005-04-24 17:09:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-24 18:01:28 | Re: Constant WAL replay |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-04-24 17:07:13 | Re: Constant WAL replay |