| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents |
| Date: | 2005-04-22 17:00:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20050422170006.GA18226@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 09:47:48AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >The bottom line is that for permanent content, you are going to have to
> >get super-majority agreement on all these issues in your statement, or
> >keep it narrow enough so you can get such a majority.
>
> So far only one person has said no (Neil). That is fairly clear to me.
So far three core members have expressed their opinion: Bruce, Josh and
Marc. What about the rest? Peter, Jan, Tom?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
Syntax error: function hell() needs an argument.
Please choose what hell you want to involve.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-22 17:01:10 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-04-22 16:59:08 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-04-22 17:00:32 | Re: Survey on software patents? |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-04-22 16:59:08 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |