Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> >>Bruce,
> >>
> >>
> >>>I think a News item is all we, as a group, are going to agree to at this
> >>>point.
> >>
> >>Oh, I don't know. Who's opposing a web button? Is there really anyone in our
> >
> >
> > Me. We didn't clean up the main PostgreSQL page to add someone else's
> > button, especially some ranting organization. If you want to do it for
> > your company, go ahead, it is your page, but the stuff we do have to be
> > 100% or pretty close.
>
> I am a little confused as to your argument Bruce. What is wrong with a
> button or link on www.postgresql.org that publicizes a page on
> www.postgresql.org the describes the communities stance on software patents.
>
> The page could also of course have links as reference to other
> legitimate anti-patent links (this is where I could see some tension).

The patent thing just isn't high-profile enough to warrant adding a
permanent link at this point. Is is a question of priority, not that
there is anything wrong with a link text.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073