Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Anjan Dave <adave(at)vantage(dot)com>
Cc: William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?)
Date: 2005-04-20 15:50:26
Message-ID: 200504201550.j3KFoQr21758@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Anjan Dave wrote:
> In terms of vendor specific models -
>
> Does anyone have any good/bad experiences/recommendations for a 4-way
> Opteron from Sun (v40z, 6 internal drives) or HP (DL585 5 internal
> drives) models?
>
> This is in comparison with the new Dell 6850 (it has PCIexpress, faster
> FSB 667MHz, which doesn't match up with AMD's total IO bandwidth, but
> much better than previous 6650s).

Dell cuts too many corners to be a good server.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard van den Berg 2005-04-20 15:54:45 Re: When are index scans used over seq scans?
Previous Message Anjan Dave 2005-04-20 15:46:46 Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?)