| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Interactive docs idea |
| Date: | 2005-04-14 18:09:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20050414180938.GB28198@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:39:11PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> I think the idea of moderating the comments is inherently flawed. You can
> either have the deliberate, planned documentation without the comments, or you
> can have the wild-west style comments system, but trying to have it both ways
> is impossible. It just leads to the current situation where the comments are
> moribund.
What do you mean, moribund? What happens is that at each release Tom
gets the comments and integrate whatever of value into the main text
body. The rest are deleted.
That's the way it should be IMHO.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"I dream about dreams about dreams", sang the nightingale
under the pale moon (Sandman)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-14 18:10:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Interactive docs idea |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-04-14 17:39:11 | Re: Interactive docs idea |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-14 18:10:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Interactive docs idea |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-04-14 17:39:11 | Re: Interactive docs idea |