Re: Réf

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Réf
Date: 2005-04-06 17:42:54
Message-ID: 20050406174254.GC13641@uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:18:29PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
> Yeah, I think that can be done provided there is more than one worker.
> My limit seems to be about 1000 transactions per second each with a
> single insert for a single process (round trip time down the Fibre
> Channel is large) but running 4 simultaneously only drops throughput to
> about 900 per process (total of 2400 transactions per second) and the
> machine still seemed to have lots of oomph to spare.

Erm, have I missed something here? 900 * 4 = 2400?

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

Responses

  • Re: Réf at 2005-04-06 18:23:10 from Rod Taylor

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Held 2005-04-06 17:45:31 Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-06 17:42:14 Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient