pgsql: Previous "64-bit fix" for intagg didn't actually work.

From: tgl(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org (Tom Lane)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: Previous "64-bit fix" for intagg didn't actually work.
Date: 2005-03-23 19:06:54
Message-ID: 20050323190654.A481D5352B@svr1.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Log Message:
-----------
Previous "64-bit fix" for intagg didn't actually work. This is already
fixed properly in CVS tip, but we need a band-aid for back branches.
Per report from Ron Mayer.

Tags:
----
REL8_0_STABLE

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/contrib/intagg:
int_aggregate.c (r1.13.4.2 -> r1.13.4.3)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/contrib/intagg/int_aggregate.c.diff?r1=1.13.4.2&r2=1.13.4.3)
int_aggregate.sql.in (r1.6.4.1 -> r1.6.4.2)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/contrib/intagg/int_aggregate.sql.in.diff?r1=1.6.4.1&r2=1.6.4.2)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-23 19:07:04 pgsql: Previous "64-bit fix" for intagg didn't actually work.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-03-23 17:05:22 pgsql: Update numbers in example: < * Add support for ANSI date