Re: What about utility to calculate planner cost constants?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Thomas F(dot)O'Connell <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>
Cc: "Tambet Matiisen" <t(dot)matiisen(at)aprote(dot)ee>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What about utility to calculate planner cost constants?
Date: 2005-03-21 22:59:56
Message-ID: 200503211459.56243.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Thomas,

> If by not practical you mean, "no one has implemented a multivariable
> testing approach," I'll agree with you. But multivariable testing is
> definitely a valid statistical approach to solving just such problems.

Well, not practical as in: "would take either $10 million in equipment or
10,000 hours or both"

--Josh

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2005-03-22 04:42:50 Re: What about utility to calculate planner cost constants?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-03-21 22:58:03 Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning?