Re: no IF - am I missing something ?

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: "Thomas F(dot)O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>
Cc: richard(dot)crawley(at)quadronservices(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: no IF - am I missing something ?
Date: 2005-03-21 07:50:49
Message-ID: 20050321075049.GA18302@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:35:22AM -0600, Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> The number of lines depends merely on where you place your line breaks.
>
> IF(days_complete <= 120, job_price, 0)AS Days_120
>
> could be written as:
>
> CASE WHEN days_complete <= 120 THEN job_price ELSE 0 END AS Days_120
>
> There might be somewhat less syntactic sugar, but this is not a five
> line expression and, to me, is more readable than a comma-delimited
> list where position alone indicates function in the expression.

CASE is also standard SQL, whereas IF isn't (unless I've overlooked
it in the SQL:2003 draft).

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Ivanko 2005-03-21 09:34:08 Test
Previous Message Akbar 2005-03-21 07:07:11 weird error on installing postgresql in Windows XP