Re: GUC variable for setting number of local buffers

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC variable for setting number of local buffers
Date: 2005-03-20 13:48:37
Message-ID: 200503201348.j2KDmbh28307@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Markus Bertheau wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> ? ???, 19/03/2005 ? 12:57 -0500, Tom Lane ?????:
>
> > It's already true that the individual buffers, as opposed to the buffer
> > descriptors, are allocated only as needed; which makes the overhead
> > of a large local_buffers setting pretty small if you don't actually do
> > much with temp tables in a given session. So I was thinking about
> > making the default value fairly robust, maybe 1000 (as compared to
> > the historical value of 64...).
>
> Why does the dba need to set that variable at all then?

It is like sort_mem that is local memory but is limited so a single
backend does not exhaust all the RAM on the machine.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-03-20 14:51:25 Re: GUC variable for setting number of local buffers
Previous Message Markus Bertheau 2005-03-20 13:27:44 Re: GUC variable for setting number of local buffers