Dave Page wrote:
> > 2. Another question is what to do with 8.0.X? Do we
> > backpatch this for
> > Win32 performance? Can we test it enough to know it will work well?
> > 8.0.2 is going to have a more rigorous testing cycle because of the
> > buffer manager changes.
> This question was asked earlier, and iirc, a few people said yes, and
> no-one said no. I'm most definitely in the yes camp.
I have backpatched O_SYNC for Win32 to 8.0.X. Everyone seems to agree
it should be supported by wal_sync_method. --- the "default" issue
still needs discussion.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2005-03-17 17:54:01|
|Subject: Re: PHP stuff|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-03-17 17:23:32|
|Subject: Re: securing pg_proc |
pgsql-hackers-win32 by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2005-03-17 18:11:04|
|Subject: Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for|
|Previous:||From: Kenneth Marshall||Date: 2005-03-17 14:12:58|
|Subject: Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?|