| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for |
| Date: | 2005-03-17 17:30:37 |
| Message-ID: | 200503171730.j2HHUbD09748@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Dave Page wrote:
> > 2. Another question is what to do with 8.0.X? Do we
> > backpatch this for
> > Win32 performance? Can we test it enough to know it will work well?
> > 8.0.2 is going to have a more rigorous testing cycle because of the
> > buffer manager changes.
>
> This question was asked earlier, and iirc, a few people said yes, and
> no-one said no. I'm most definitely in the yes camp.
I have backpatched O_SYNC for Win32 to 8.0.X. Everyone seems to agree
it should be supported by wal_sync_method. --- the "default" issue
still needs discussion.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-03-17 17:54:01 | Re: PHP stuff |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-17 17:23:32 | Re: securing pg_proc |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-03-17 18:11:04 | Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2005-03-17 14:12:58 | Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32? |