Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ?
Date: 2005-03-14 02:58:18
Message-ID: 200503140258.j2E2wIB20736@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Chris,
>
> > For an organization like PGDG that _isn't_ politically activist in
> > nature (and that arguably isn't clearly defined for legal purposes) to
> > steer clear of political activism doesn't seem particularly
> > schizophrenic to me...
>
> Yes, but it would be hard to argue that anyone in the Postgres project favors
> software patents.

I am sure some of our new users _do_ favor software patents, perhaps
because they don't yet understand the problems they are causing.

Do we want the PostgreSQL web site to be educating them? If we do, we
have to educate, not put a banner up there, and if we don't want to
educate, we shouldn't put it up there.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2005-03-14 04:51:48 == PostgreSQL Weekly News - March 13 2005 ==
Previous Message Mitch Pirtle 2005-03-14 01:05:09 Re: Types of OSS Projects, review requested