| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bumping libpq version number? |
| Date: | 2005-03-11 22:17:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20050311181714.I92893@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Are we still bumping the libpq major version number for 8.0.2?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> I
>>> think it is a bad idea because we will require too many client apps
>>> to be recompiled,
>>
>> That is not true, as previously discussed.
>
> It is not true only if the old libpq stays around, which isn't always
> the case.
that's an administrative decision though, not ours ... we have source code
going back to 6.x, so it isn't like older versions aren't available ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-03-11 22:18:01 | Re: Bumping libpq version number? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-03-11 22:17:07 | Re: Bumping libpq version number? |