Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent

From: Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Date: 2005-03-02 21:10:18
Message-ID: 20050302211018.GB19492@osdl.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:15:54PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
> > Ah, ok. I've reapplied the 2Q patch to CVS from 20050301:
> > http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/313/
>
> > I ran it for 3 hours, just in case, and the charts suggest it flattens
> > out after 2 hours.
>
> Thanks. This seems odd though, since it appears to level out at
> something above 4K TPM. Your previous run
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/311/
> shows it dropping to 3500 or so. What changed?

Other than pulling from CVS at a different time, it should all be
the same parameters, etc.

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wes 2005-03-02 21:31:12 Re: Vacuum time degrading
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2005-03-02 20:17:08 Re: bitmap AM design