| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans |
| Date: | 2005-02-25 16:37:01 |
| Message-ID: | 200502251737.02484.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 15:42 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
> Based on past discussions on a 12 to 18 month dev cycle for 8.1, and based
> on past track record, I'd say closer to the 18 month, so figure on June
> '06, with freeze in January of '06 (12 month dev, 6 month beta) ...
> subject to change, but I wouldn't expect a freeze until Jan '06, beta
> period might be shorter though ...
I certainly hope that this is wrong. I think the past cycles that saw major
releases every 11 or 12 months were OK, albeit too long for my taste, but 18
months is way too long both from the users' and the developers' point of
view.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-02-25 16:40:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-25 16:36:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-02-25 16:40:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-25 16:36:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans |