Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report

From: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report
Date: 2005-02-25 13:42:51
Message-ID: 20050225084251.5e4ae212.darcy@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:00:48 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I read the following report from the NetBSD group:
>
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/4680
>
> It has some interesting points. First, they analyze how the fit with
> other open source database offerings. Their position is somewhat
> similar to ours.
>
> Their development style is also similar to ours.

Not too surprising since both projects came out of Berkeley.

> They complain about release delays and the challenge of organizing
> volunteers, just like us.

Is there any volunteer organization that's any different? :-)

> Second, they have a much more rigid hierarchy structure. There are
> good and bad things about that and you can see it in the report.

It could be that the people really do make a difference but, as a NetBSD
developer, I never really feel that the hierarchy gets in the way of
doing things. I think that in any organization the people get stuff
done regardless of what structure is in place. It depends more on the
people than the structure.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-02-25 14:42:57 Re: Development Plans
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-02-25 10:34:12 Development Plans

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-02-25 14:42:57 Re: Development Plans
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-02-25 13:38:50 Re: idea for concurrent seqscans