Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bibliography updates for new editions?

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bibliography updates for new editions?
Date: 2005-02-16 01:07:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:11:58AM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:57:34AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 03:20 schrieb Michael Fuhr:
> > > Should entries in the Bibliography be updated to reflect new editions?
> > 
> > Sure.  Please submit a patch.
> Will do.  Just wanted to make sure I wouldn't be wasting anybody's
> time by doing so.

Should I update the biblioentry id's, or are they keys that shouldn't
be changed so other documents that refer to them don't need to be
updated?  For example, should DATE94 remain the same, or should it
become DATE04 (or DATE2004)?  I see that BOWMAN93 refers to a 1996
edition of that book, so I'm guessing the id's should remain untouched.
Just wanted to be sure, though.


Michael Fuhr

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Preston LandersDate: 2005-02-16 17:30:33
Subject: Suggestion for Encodings table
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2005-02-15 21:02:46
Subject: Re: How the planner uses statistics

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group