Re: Bibliography updates for new editions?

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bibliography updates for new editions?
Date: 2005-02-16 01:07:50
Message-ID: 20050216010750.GB13781@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:11:58AM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:57:34AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2005 03:20 schrieb Michael Fuhr:
> > > Should entries in the Bibliography be updated to reflect new editions?
> >
> > Sure. Please submit a patch.
>
> Will do. Just wanted to make sure I wouldn't be wasting anybody's
> time by doing so.

Should I update the biblioentry id's, or are they keys that shouldn't
be changed so other documents that refer to them don't need to be
updated? For example, should DATE94 remain the same, or should it
become DATE04 (or DATE2004)? I see that BOWMAN93 refers to a 1996
edition of that book, so I'm guessing the id's should remain untouched.
Just wanted to be sure, though.

Thanks.

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Preston Landers 2005-02-16 17:30:33 Suggestion for Encodings table
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2005-02-15 21:02:46 Re: How the planner uses statistics