Re: using strxfrm for having multi locale/please vote for

This has been saved for the 8.1 release:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mahmoud Taghizadeh wrote:
> there was a discussion in postgresql mailing list about using strxfrm function to add support multi locale.
> most of developers agree that this method is a correct but not perfect solution for having multiple locale in postgresql and some people suggest to add such functions in contribution.
>
> the main problem of such functions is the overhead of setlocale. (that can be ommited when you run postgresql in a OS with advanced GLIBC and strxfrm_l function)
>
> I summerized discussion and add one implementation of such functions, I try to convince tom lane to add this function to the contribution but I failed.
>
> maybe you are not interested to this subject but I kindly ask you to say your idea in list.
> please tell clearly that you are agree/disagree for add this function in contribution or not.
>
>
> I am thankful in advance.
>
>
>
>
> With Regards,
> --taghi
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

Content-Description: nls_sort.tgz

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073