| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem |
| Date: | 2005-02-01 14:24:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20050201142438.GC5069@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice |
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 06:31:30PM +1100, John Hansen wrote:
> Since OID's are now deprecated, and will eventually disappear,
> wouldn't it be a good idea, to have INSERT and UPDATE return
> a copy of the tuple that was inserted/updated?
How about the TID?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"El destino baraja y nosotros jugamos" (A. Schopenhauer)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Hansen | 2005-02-01 14:48:49 | Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem |
| Previous Message | a_ogawa | 2005-02-01 13:06:43 | Re: FunctionCallN improvement. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Hansen | 2005-02-01 14:48:49 | Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem |
| Previous Message | Kjetil Haaland | 2005-02-01 14:19:23 | Re: function returning a row |