| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Date: | 2005-01-28 15:34:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20050128153425.GD9076@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:07:51PM +0100, Hervé Piedvache wrote:
> Yes seems to be the only solution ... but I'm a little disapointed about
> this ... could you explain me why there is not this kind of
> functionnality ... it seems to be a real need for big applications no ?
I hate to be snarky, but the reason there isn't this kind of system
just hanging around is that it's a Very Hard Problem. I spent 2 days
last week in a room with some of the smartest people I know, and
there was widespread agreement that what you want is a very tough
problem.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2005-01-28 15:36:20 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2005-01-28 15:33:03 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |