| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Date: | 2005-01-27 18:27:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20050127182731.GB6355@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:23:30PM -0800, Kevin Brown wrote:
> beefier CPU setup would be in order. But in my (limited) experience,
> the disk subsystem is likely to be a bottleneck long before the CPU is
> in the general case, especially these days as disk subsystems haven't
> improved in performance nearly as quickly as CPUs have.
Indeed. And you can go through an awful lot of budget buying solid
state storage ;-)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-01-27 18:33:33 | Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance??? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2005-01-27 18:26:28 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |