Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
Date: 2005-01-23 21:15:49
Message-ID: 20050123211549.GC19315@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Stephan,

On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 03:14:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> Smaller patches are easier to review, for sure. Also, you'll need to
> coordinate with Alvaro's work on dependencies for global objects.

If you want, I can send you the current patch so you can see what has
changed in it, maybe merge it with some work of yours for separate
submittal.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca" (Orual)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-01-23 21:34:23 Re: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2
Previous Message Yann Michel 2005-01-23 21:00:06 Re: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-01-23 21:36:18 Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-01-23 20:14:04 Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED