Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
Date: 2005-01-22 20:36:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Hi Stephen,

> > I have to disagree with your model. Roles are not so simple like
> you
> > try to describe in your patch. I'm suposing this because your using
> > role* in all of the 'pg_shadow'.
> The particular name isn't really important- and don't take it to mean
> very much...
OK. So let it 'use*'.

> > What's Role? A set of relations with their respective privileges
> and
> > a set of users and/or roles.
> That's a good question- I'm not really very familiar with roles. :) 
> I'm
> honestly more interested in group ownership...
OK. Thinking better, keep up your work. I'm going to keep my eyes on

Euler Taveira de Oliveira

Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora. - Internet rápida e grátis

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-22 20:57:22
Subject: Re: ARC patent
Previous:From: Nicolai TufarDate: 2005-01-22 20:19:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-01-22 20:51:00
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum/Win32 Fixes
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-01-22 20:06:33
Subject: Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group