Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Problems with infinity

From: Oliver Siegmar <o(dot)siegmar(at)vitrado(dot)de>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problems with infinity
Date: 2005-01-21 08:07:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
On Friday 21 January 2005 09:06, Kris Jurka wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
> > The current infinity implementation in pgjdbc is a hack, because you have
> > to set/get magic values that represents '-infinity' and 'infinity', but
> > it is imho the best way to do until there might be an NEGATIVE_INFINITY
> > and POSITIVE_INFINTIY for java.util.Date like the one for
> > java.lang.Double.
> Well, no one seems to have any better ideas, how about a better place for
> the infinity constants.  org.postgresql.jdbc2.TimestampUtils is not a
> public interface.  PGStatement?

I vote for PGStatement :-)


In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Xavier PoinsardDate: 2005-01-21 09:22:19
Subject: Documentation for jdbc escapes
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2005-01-21 08:06:58
Subject: Re: Problems with infinity

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group