| From: | Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Date: | 2005-01-20 14:42:06 |
| Message-ID: | 200501201542.06645.herve@elma.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Le Jeudi 20 Janvier 2005 15:38, Christopher Kings-Lynne a écrit :
> > Sorry but I don't agree with this ... Slony is a replication solution ...
> > I don't need replication ... what will I do when my database will grow up
> > to 50 Gb ... I'll need more than 50 Gb of RAM on each server ???
> > This solution is not very realistic for me ...
> >
> > I need a Cluster solution not a replication one or explain me in details
> > how I will do for managing the scalabilty of my database ...
>
> Buy Oracle
I think this is not my solution ... sorry I'm talking about finding a
PostgreSQL solution ...
--
Hervé Piedvache
Elma Ingénierie Informatique
6 rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré
F-75008 - Paris - France
Pho. 33-144949901
Fax. 33-144949902
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-01-20 14:44:16 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Previous Message | Dan Langille | 2005-01-20 14:40:21 | Re: index scan of whole table, can't see why |