Re: [HACKERS] Much Ado About COUNT(*)

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: Wes <wespvp(at)syntegra(dot)com>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Date: 2005-01-14 23:37:49
Message-ID: 20050114233745.GH1724@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 03:11:32PM -0800, Dann Corbit wrote:
> A cardinality estimate function might be nice.
> SELECT cardinality_estimate(table_name)
> If it is off by 25% then no big deal.
> It would be useful for the PostgreSQL query planner also, I imagine.

If that's all you want, what about the row estimate from pg_class? It
has the number of rows active at last vacuum... For really large tables
I imagine it'd be easily close enough...

Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-14 23:43:25 Re: Parsing of backslash in statements via ODBC
Previous Message Terry Lee Tucker 2005-01-14 23:34:38 Re: OID Usage