Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lance Obermeyer <LObermey(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement
Date: 2005-01-11 18:14:14
Message-ID: 200501111014.14255.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Bruce,

> In fact we registered PostgreSQL only to prevent someone else from
> registering it and blocking the community from using it.  We want others
> to use it for their products so if our registering it prevented you from
> using it, that is a shame and is not what we intended, in fact the
> opposite.  We registered it so you would be safe to use it.
>
> Can someone explain how this is to be handled?  I don't think the
> trademark laws really encourage someone to trademark something so others
> can use it and we should figure out a plan.

Well, one obvious possibility is, once we get the Foundation approved by the
IRS, to transfer ownership of the trademark to the Foundation. Then the
Foundation can offer the trademark under a public license that explicitly
gives permission to anyone to use it who is "using it properly", that is for
a distribution of the PostgreSQL code.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Bernier 2005-01-11 18:26:08 Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-01-11 18:03:34 Re: Pervasive PostgreSQL Announcement