| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Scheduler in Postgres |
| Date: | 2004-12-20 06:00:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20041220060012.GC61397@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 10:22:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> > Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when decibel(at)decibel(dot)org ("Jim C. Nasby") would write:
> >> In PostgreSQL, there's currently no way to assume the identity of
> >> another user.
>
> > I'm confused at that...
>
> > There seem to be ways at time of connection establishment, whether via
> > the psql "-U" option, or the PGconnect "dbuser=foo" option, or during
> > a psql session via "\c - newuser".
>
> Not to mention SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION.
Doh! Completely forgot about that.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2004-12-20 06:18:05 | pgjob registered on pgFoundary |
| Previous Message | Vincent Hikida | 2004-12-20 02:55:01 | Re: UNION with more restrictive DISTINCT |