Re: Questions on stored-procedure best practices

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Questions on stored-procedure best practices
Date: 2004-12-11 20:42:18
Message-ID: 20041211214218.B572@hermes.hilbert.loc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> file-names:
> I know it doesn't matter, but mostly it seems to make sense to put
> stuff in .sql files. I've seen some reference to people putting stuff
> in .sp files. What works best for people in terms of organization?
GnuMed uses *.sql and we haven't had anyone wondering about it
if that's an indicator of it having immediate appeal.

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2004-12-11 20:45:49 Re: relation "sql_features" does not exist
Previous Message Clodoaldo Pinto 2004-12-11 20:05:25 Re: postgresql and javascript