From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Matt <matt(at)kynx(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to handle larger databases? |
Date: | 2004-11-22 11:42:50 |
Message-ID: | 20041122114246.GF6330@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 11:33:35AM +0000, Matt wrote:
> > Especially since PostgreSQL has no fixed length string types, so
> > following that advice would exclude any strings. That's kind of
> > useless.
>
> char(n) ?
Is not fixed length. The actual size varies by encoding. Consider the
string:
zeeën
Latin-9 5 bytes
UTF-8 6 bytes
UTF-16 10 bytes
But it should still fit in a char(5), wouldn't you agree?
In postgresql there is no difference in storage method between text,
varchar(n) and char(n).
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Katsaros Kwn/nos | 2004-11-22 12:25:26 | Oid to text... |
Previous Message | Cornelius Buschka | 2004-11-22 11:33:47 | Re: Delete very slow after deletion of many rows in dependent |