Re: Vote on Omar Design

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vote on Omar Design
Date: 2004-11-19 19:19:21
Message-ID: 20041119151732.W75727@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> My understanding was that the vote was to actually get Omar's design in
> place. It is also my understanding that Omar's design works with the
> existing framework (code etc..). That means, in theory that we could
> have a new design in place with a reasonable amount of work.

The thing is, we already have a new design
(http://wwwdevel.postgresql.org/) ... so its not 'a design' that is
holding things up ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-11-19 19:30:34 Re: Vote on Omar Design
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-11-19 19:07:44 Re: Vote on Omar Design