Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>, Omar Kilani <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design
Date: 2004-11-13 04:42:17
Message-ID: 20041113004136.S3792@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> OK, fair enough. Now can someone explain how we can put out a
>>> release evrery 8-12 months with 200-300 changes, some very complex,
>>> and we can't get a group together to update a web site?
>>
>> Because a lot less people are working on the web site, and none of
>> them are paid to do so?
>
> We put out regular releases long before (some) people started getting
> paid for their work. If now we're only getting work done if someone's
> getting paid for it, we're in trouble.

I agree ... IMHO, its like docs ... its not something ppl want to do,
since they have a perception that its not as "cool' as orking on the code
...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-11-13 05:01:03 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-11-13 03:02:15 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-11-13 05:01:03 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-11-13 03:29:32 Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design