Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general

From: "Net Virtual Mailing Lists" <mailinglists(at)net-virtual(dot)com>
To: "Pgsql General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general
Date: 2004-11-10 23:03:48
Message-ID: 20041110230349.31866@mail.net-virtual.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Yeah.. I'm with you.. I don't really know what all of this is about - I
like the way the Postgres mailing list works as it is.... Are any of the
changes being discussed here going to change the content or how we
receive the mailing lists?..

.. The only change I've noticed is that in all the time of reading this
list I've not seen jerks posting forged messages like that....
Certainly not a positive change, but I'm not sure it can be attributed to
what is going on...

- Greg

>??? As a longstanding reader of the pgsql-
>mailinglists, (including via news.postgresql.org on
>occasion), all I see is some outsiders trying to help
>us "fix" a problem that does not exist. And yes, I
>have read most of the messages that have passed by in
>these threads. After all that, I still don't see the
>benefit.
>
>Perhaps that is why these conversations have been
>carried on almost totally by people who do not post to
>the pgsql lists.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message "Miquel van Smoorenburg" 2004-11-10 23:05:34 Re: index not always used when selecting on a date field
Previous Message Net Virtual Mailing Lists 2004-11-10 23:01:45 Re: [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.4794 (21 messages)